Obama-Appointed Judge Sides with Musk’s DOGE, Leaves Blue-State AGs Fuming

Phanphen Kaewwannarat
Phanphen Kaewwannarat

In a surprising twist that has left Democratic attorneys general seething, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, has denied a motion to halt the actions of Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This decision permits DOGE to continue its mission of streamlining federal agencies, much to the chagrin of blue-state officials.

Fourteen Democratic attorneys general recently filed a lawsuit aiming to immediately bar DOGE from executing layoffs, accessing sensitive agency data, and dismantling what they consider essential government functions. They accused President Donald Trump of breaching the Constitution’s Appointments Clause by granting Musk, an unelected individual, significant authority over federal operations.

Judge Chutkan, known for her previous rulings against Trump and his associates, acknowledged the plaintiffs’ concerns regarding Musk’s expansive role. She stated, “Plaintiffs legitimately call into question what appears to be the unchecked authority of an unelected individual and an entity that was not created by Congress and over which it has no oversight.” Despite this acknowledgment, she found the evidence insufficient to justify an immediate restraining order against DOGE’s activities.

The Democratic AGs highlighted DOGE’s involvement in at least 17 federal agencies, expressing particular dismay over its efforts to overhaul the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). They argue that such actions could undermine critical programs and services relied upon by millions of Americans.

In response to the lawsuit, Joshua Fisher, director of the White House Office of Administration, clarified Musk’s position within the administration. He described Musk as a senior advisor to the president and a non-career special government employee, similar to roles held by individuals in previous administrations. Fisher emphasized that Musk’s capacity is advisory, stating, “Mr. Musk can only advise the President and communicate the President’s directives.”

This legal battle underscores the escalating tension between the Trump administration’s aggressive approach to reducing bureaucratic inefficiencies and Democratic officials’ efforts to preserve established governmental structures. While Judge Chutkan’s ruling allows DOGE to proceed with its initiatives for now, the broader constitutional questions surrounding Musk’s authority remain unresolved.

As the administration continues its campaign to “drain the swamp,” this development signifies a significant victory for proponents of government reform. It also serves as a stark reminder to entrenched bureaucrats and their allies that the current administration is determined to challenge the status quo, regardless of the legal hurdles that may arise.

In the coming weeks, as further legal challenges are anticipated, the nation will witness a pivotal struggle over the balance of power, the role of unelected officials, and the future of federal governance. One thing is clear: the Trump administration, bolstered by allies like Elon Musk, is unwavering in its commitment to reshaping Washington, much to the dismay of its detractors.